Kramer; Charles J.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kramer; Charles J..The latest application filed is for "post exposure method for enhancing durability of negative working lithographic plates".

Company Profile

0.21.4

Kramer; Charles J. - Webster NY
Kramer, Charles J. - Rochester NY
Kramer; Charles J. - Pittsford NY

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Diffraction grating-based wavelength selection unit having improved polarization dependent performance Grant 6,765,724 - Kramer July 20, 2	2004-07-20
Process for preparing a printing plate Grant 6,630,286 - Kramer October 7, 2	2003-10-07
Post exposure method for enhancing durability of negative working lithographic plates App 20030118944 - Copeland, Harry ; et al.	2003-06-26
Diffraction Grating-based Wavelength Selection Unit App 20030076590 - Kramer, Charles J.	2003-04-24
Novel Surface-relief Diffraction Grating App 20030076594 - Kramer, Charles J.	2003-04-24
Process for preparing a printing plate App 20020119395 - Kramer, Charles J.	2002-08-29
Rotationally symmetric dual reflection optical beam scanner and system using same Grant 5,367,399 - Kramer November 22, 1	1994-11-22
Optical beam scanners for imaging applications Grant 5,223,956 - Kramer , et al. June 29, 1	1993-06-29
Adjustable fixed mount for a hologon deflector Grant 5,183,350 - Kramer February 2, 1	1993-02-02
Simultaneous multibeam scanning system Grant 5,179,463 - Kramer January 12, 1	1993-01-12
Simultaneous multibeam scanning system Grant 5,097,351 - Kramer March 17, 1	1992-03-17
Hologon scanner system Grant 5,046,794 - Ritter , et al. September 10, 1	1991-09-10
Hologon deflection system having dispersive optical elements for scan line bow correction, wavelength shift correction and scanning spot ellipticity correction Grant 4,973,112 - Kramer November 27, 1	1990-11-27
Hologan scanner system Grant 4,852,956 - Kramer August 1, 1	1989-08-01
Integrated laser beam scanning system Grant 4,779,944 - Ritter , et al. October 25, 1	1988-10-25
Electro-optic pulse imaging raster output scanner Grant 4,639,073 - Yip , et al. January 27, 1	1987-01-27
Preobjective hologon scanner system Grant 4,583,816 - Kramer April 22, 1	1986-04-22
Fluorescent activated, spatially quantitative light detector Grant 4,371,897 - Kramer February 1, 1	1983-02-01
Multiple function reproduction apparatus Grant 4,345,835 - Kramer , et al. August 24, 1	1982-08-24
Linear integrating cavity light collector Grant 4,321,630 - Kramer March 23, 1	1982-03-23
Diffraction based light collector Grant 4,314,283 - Kramer February 2, 1	1982-02-02
Optical scanner using plane linear diffraction gratings on a rotating spinner Grant 4,289,371 - Kramer September 15, 1	1981-09-15
Holographic scanner insensitive to mechanical wobble Grant 4,243,293 - Kramer January 6, 1	1981-01-06
Holographic scanner for reconstructing a scanning light spot insensitive to a mechanical wobble Grant 4,239,326 - Kramer December 16, 1	1980-12-16
Holographic scanning spinner Grant 4,067,639 - Kramer January 10, 1	1978-01-10

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.