Kotaki; Masahiro
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kotaki; Masahiro.The latest application filed is for "light-emitting device of gallium nitride compound semiconductor".
- Kotaki; Masahiro - Inazawa JP
- Kotaki; Masahiro - Nakashima-gun JP
- Kotaki; Masahiro - Nagoya JP
- Kotaki; Masahiro - Nishio JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Light-emitting device of gallium nitride compound semiconductor Grant RE36,747 - Manabe , et al. June 27, 2 | 2000-06-27 |
| Light emitting semiconductor device using nitrogen-Group III compound Grant 5,905,276 - Manabe , et al. May 18, 1 | 1999-05-18 |
| Light-emitting device of gallium nitride compound semiconductor Grant 5,408,120 - Manabe , et al. April 18, 1 | 1995-04-18 |
| Light-emitting semiconductor device using gallium nitride group compound Grant 5,281,830 - Kotaki , et al. January 25, 1 | 1994-01-25 |
| Dry etching method for semiconductor Grant 5,205,905 - Kotaki , et al. April 27, 1 | 1993-04-27 |
| Dry etching method for semiconductor Grant 4,946,548 - Kotaki , et al. August 7, 1 | 1990-08-07 |
| Vehicle top mark Grant 4,646,208 - Hayashi , et al. February 24, 1 | 1987-02-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 