Koster; Michael J.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Koster; Michael J..The latest application filed is for "cluster of processing nodes with distributed global flash memory using commodity server technology".

Company Profile

0.17.5

Koster; Michael J. - Bridgeville CA US
Koster; Michael J. - Austin TX
Koster; Michael J. - Freemont CA
Koster; Michael J. - Fremont CA

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Non-volatile solid-state storage system supporting high bandwidth and random access Grant 9,164,554 - Bruening , et al. October 20, 2	2015-10-20
Cluster of processing nodes with distributed global flash memory using commodity server technology Grant 9,047,351 - Riddle , et al. June 2, 2	2015-06-02
Failure recovery using consensus replication in a distributed flash memory system Grant 8,856,593 - Eckhardt , et al. October 7, 2	2014-10-07
Efficient hardware scheme to support cross-cluster transactional memory Grant 8,396,937 - O'Krafka , et al. March 12, 2	2013-03-12
Shared cache for point-to-point connected processing nodes Grant 8,151,057 - Koster , et al. April 3, 2	2012-04-03
Cluster Of Processing Nodes With Distributed Global Flash Memory Using Commodity Server Technology App 20120017037 - Riddle; Thomas A. ; et al.	2012-01-19
Failure Recovery Using Consensus Replication In A Distributed Flash Memory System App 20120011398 - Eckhardt; Andrew D. ; et al.	2012-01-12
Non-volatile Solid-state Storage System Supporting High Bandwidth And Random Access App 20120011302 - Bruening; Ulrich ; et al.	2012-01-12
Maintaining memory checkpoints across a cluster of computing nodes Grant 7,856,421 - O'Krafka , et al. December 21, 2	2010-12-21
Snooping-based cache-coherence filter for a point-to-point connected multiprocessing node Grant 7,698,509 - Koster , et al. April 13, 2	2010-04-13
Cache protocol enhancements in a proximity communication-based off-chip cache memory architecture Grant 7,562,190 - Koster , et al. July 14, 2	2009-07-14
Proximity communication-based off-chip cache memory architectures Grant 7,496,712 - O'Krafka , et al. February 24, 2	2009-02-24
Maintaining Memory Checkpoints Across A Cluster Of Computing Nodes App 20080288556 - O'Krafka; Brian W. ; et al.	2008-11-20
Speculative memory accesses in a proximity communication-based off-chip cache memory architecture Grant 7,444,473 - Koster , et al. October 28, 2	2008-10-28
Bandwidth reduction technique in a snooping-based cache-coherent cluster of multiprocessing nodes Grant 7,315,919 - O'Krafka , et al. January 1, 2	2008-01-01
Conservative shadow cache support in a point-to-point connected multiprocessing node Grant 7,213,106 - Koster , et al. May 1, 2	2007-05-01
Bandwidth reduction technique using cache-to-cache transfer prediction in a snooping-based cache-coherent cluster of multiprocessing nodes Grant 7,174,430 - O'Krafka , et al. February 6, 2	2007-02-06
Method and apparatus for implementing cache coherence with adaptive write updates App 20050120182 - Koster, Michael J. ; et al.	2005-06-02

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.