loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kollin; Nancy Donaldson.The latest application filed is for "pulp and synthetic fiber absorbent composites for personal care products".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Creped materials Grant 6,838,154 - Varona , et al. January 4, 2 | 2005-01-04 |
Pulp and synthetic fiber absorbent composites for personal care products Grant 6,759,567 - Colman , et al. July 6, 2 | 2004-07-06 |
Personal care products having reduced leakage Grant 6,723,892 - Daley , et al. April 20, 2 | 2004-04-20 |
Personal care product with fluid partitioning Grant 6,627,789 - VanDenBogart , et al. September 30, 2 | 2003-09-30 |
Pulp And Synthetic Fiber Absorbent Composites For Personal Care Products App 20030014028 - Colman, Charles Wilson ;   et al. | 2003-01-16 |
Apertured film covers with localized wettability and method for making the same Grant 6,410,823 - Daley , et al. June 25, 2 | 2002-06-25 |
Liquid absorbent material for personal care absorbent articles and the like Grant 6,221,460 - Weber , et al. April 24, 2 | 2001-04-24 |
Stabilized absorbent material for improved distribution performance with visco-elastic fluids Grant 6,172,276 - Hetzler , et al. January 9, 2 | 2001-01-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.