loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kokura; Kunio.The latest application filed is for "optical fiber ribbon, and optical-fiber-ribbon production method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Optical fiber, and optical-fiber production method Grant 9,958,604 - Kokura May 1, 2 | 2018-05-01 |
Optical fiber ribbon, and optical-fiber-ribbon production method Grant 9,958,626 - Kokura May 1, 2 | 2018-05-01 |
Optical Fiber Ribbon, and Optical-Fiber-Ribbon Production Method App 20170299830 - Kokura; Kunio | 2017-10-19 |
Optical Fiber, and Optical-Fiber Production Method App 20170285258 - Kokura; Kunio | 2017-10-05 |
Optical transmission line, negative dispersion optical fiber used for the optical transmission line, and optical transmission system comprising optical transmission line Grant 6,606,437 - Mukasa , et al. August 12, 2 | 2003-08-12 |
Optical fiber and its manufacturing method Grant 6,069,988 - Kokura , et al. May 30, 2 | 2000-05-30 |
Dispersion compensating optical fiber Grant 5,673,354 - Akasaka , et al. September 30, 1 | 1997-09-30 |
Dispersion compensating optical fiber for wavelength multiplex transmission and method using same Grant 5,568,583 - Akasaka , et al. October 22, 1 | 1996-10-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.