loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kokubo; Kouichi.The latest application filed is for "ultrasonic flaw detecting apparatus and ultrasonic flaw detecting method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Ultrasonic flaw detecting apparatus and ultrasonic flaw detecting method Grant 9,157,896 - Ito , et al. October 13, 2 | 2015-10-13 |
Ultrasonic Flaw Detecting Apparatus And Ultrasonic Flaw Detecting Method App 20110232386 - ITO; Yoshino ;   et al. | 2011-09-29 |
Pressure control system for suspension Grant 5,078,421 - Kokubo , et al. January 7, 1 | 1992-01-07 |
Fluid pressure type active suspension responsive to change of rate of change of vehicle height or change of acceleration of vehicle body Grant 5,071,158 - Yonekawa , et al. December 10, 1 | 1991-12-10 |
Fluid pressure type active suspension with bypass control for working fluid pressure operative with variable target value Grant 5,042,834 - Yonekawa , et al. August 27, 1 | 1991-08-27 |
Pressure control system for suspension Grant 5,024,459 - Kokubo , et al. June 18, 1 | 1991-06-18 |
Hydraulic suspension system for a vehicle with less abrupt change in vehicle height when started Grant 4,973,080 - Ikemoto , et al. November 27, 1 | 1990-11-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.