Koegel; Robert J.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Koegel; Robert J..The latest application filed is for "apparatus for controlling concurrent operations of a system control unit including activity register circuitry".
- Koegel; Robert J. - Glendale AZ
- Koegel; Robert J. - Phoenix AZ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus for controlling concurrent operations of a system control unit including activity register circuitry Grant 5,036,456 - Koegel July 30, 1 | 1991-07-30 |
| Circuit for preventing lock-out of high priority requests to a system controller Grant 5,025,370 - Koegel , et al. June 18, 1 | 1991-06-18 |
| Apparatus for controlling system accesses having multiple command level conditional rotational multiple port servicing priority hierarchy Grant 4,821,177 - Koegel , et al. April 11, 1 | 1989-04-11 |
| Maintenance panel for communicating with an automated maintenance system Grant 4,424,576 - Lange , et al. January 3, 1 | 1984-01-03 |
| Microprocessor based maintenance system Grant 4,308,615 - Koegel , et al. December 29, 1 | 1981-12-29 |
| Data Communication System Grant 3,618,031 - Kennedy , et al. November 2, 1 | 1971-11-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 