Koch; Cornelius
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Koch; Cornelius.The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for inspecting an object, particularly a piece of luggage".
- Koch; Cornelius - Hochheim DE
- Koch; Cornelius - Wiesbaden DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and apparatus for inspecting an object, particularly a piece of luggage Grant 6,584,170 - Aust , et al. June 24, 2 | 2003-06-24 |
| Method and apparatus for inspecting an object, particularly a piece of luggage App 20030031293 - Aust, Stefan ; et al. | 2003-02-13 |
| Apparatus for the transillumination of articles with a fan-shaped radiation beam Grant 5,091,924 - Bermbach , et al. February 25, 1 | 1992-02-25 |
| Apparatus for the transillumination of articles with fan-shaped radiation Grant 5,065,418 - Bermbach , et al. November 12, 1 | 1991-11-12 |
| X-ray scanner & detector signal processing system Grant 4,788,704 - Donges , et al. November 29, 1 | 1988-11-29 |
| X-ray scanner Grant 4,756,015 - Doenges , et al. July 5, 1 | 1988-07-05 |
| X-ray scanner Grant 4,736,401 - Donges , et al. April 5, 1 | 1988-04-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 