loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kobayashi; Seishichi.The latest application filed is for "acrylic plastisol adhesion structure".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Acrylic plastisol adhesion structure Grant 5,677,053 - Moriga , et al. October 14, 1 | 1997-10-14 |
Plastisol composition Grant 5,441,994 - Moriga , et al. August 15, 1 | 1995-08-15 |
Thickness-reduced deep-draw-formed can Grant 5,228,588 - Aizawa , et al. July 20, 1 | 1993-07-20 |
Packing can Grant 5,100,017 - Ishinabe , et al. March 31, 1 | 1992-03-31 |
Butt-welded cans and process for manufacturing the same Grant 4,840,304 - Sato , et al. June 20, 1 | 1989-06-20 |
Metal vessel having circumferential side seam and adhesive primer for use in production thereof Grant 4,556,151 - Taira , et al. December 3, 1 | 1985-12-03 |
Hot-melt adhesive of a copolyester of a dibasic acid with a polyhydric alcohol Grant 4,500,575 - Taira , et al. February 19, 1 | 1985-02-19 |
Side seam-coated welded cans and process for preparation thereof Grant 4,451,506 - Kobayashi , et al. May 29, 1 | 1984-05-29 |
Side seam-coated tin-free steel welded can Grant 4,384,657 - Ueno , et al. May 24, 1 | 1983-05-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.