Klemic; James F.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Klemic; James F..The latest application filed is for "nanoelectronic-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay system and method".
- Klemic; James F. - Falls Church VA
- Klemic; James F. - New Haven CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Nanoelectronic-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay system and method Grant 9,921,216 - Fahmy , et al. March 20, 2 | 2018-03-20 |
| Nanoelectronic-enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay System And Method App 20160054315 - Fahmy; Tarek M. ; et al. | 2016-02-25 |
| Nanoelectronic-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay system and method Grant 9,188,594 - Fahmy , et al. November 17, 2 | 2015-11-17 |
| CMOS-compatible silicon nano-wire sensors with biochemical and cellular interfaces Grant 9,076,665 - Stern , et al. July 7, 2 | 2015-07-07 |
| Systems and Methods for CMOS-Compatible Silicon Nano-Wire Sensors with Biochemical and Cellular Interfaces App 20100297608 - Stern; Eric D. ; et al. | 2010-11-25 |
| Planar patch clamp electrodes Grant 6,699,697 - Klemic , et al. March 2, 2 | 2004-03-02 |
| Planar patch clamp electrodes App 20020064841 - Klemic, Kathryn G. ; et al. | 2002-05-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 