KITZ SCT CORPORATION
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Kitz Sct Corporation. Kitz Sct Corporation has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "LOCK ASSIST"
- Company Aliases
- KITZ SCT CORPORATION
- Kitz SCT Corporation - Tokyo JP
| State Incorporated | JAPAN |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 5-1, Ohmori-Kita 1-chome Ohta-ku, Tokyo JAPAN 143-0016 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| LOCK DEVICE FOR PIPE COUPLING AND VALVE COUPLING PART 20210071786 - 16/962429 KOGURE; Yusaku | 2021-03-11 |
| SET OF JIGS FOR ASSEMBLING A VALVE, AND A DIAPHRAGM VALVE ASSEMBLED WITH THE SAME 20210048110 - 17/085548 IIZUKA; Hisanobu | 2021-02-18 |
| VACUUM BELLOWS HOT VALVE 20200300384 - 16/810181 IIJIMA; Kazuo | 2020-09-24 |
| ONE-TOUCH LOCK VALVE AND RAW MATERIAL CONTAINER 20200173577 - 16/620979 KOGURE; Yusaku | 2020-06-04 |
| DIAPHRAGM VALVE 20200173564 - 16/468344 KOU; Chokuto | 2020-06-04 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"LOCK ASSIST" 88225137 |
LOCK ASSIST 2018-12-11 |
"SCV SUBMERSIBLE VALVE" 5938688 87766121 |
SCV SUBMERSIBLE VALVE 2018-01-23 |
"SCV" 2813710 76365788 |
SCV 2002-02-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 