loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kitagawa; Motoki.The latest application filed is for "method for producing acrylic rubber".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method For Producing Acrylic Rubber App 20220185913 - Ozaki; Taro ;   et al. | 2022-06-16 |
Acrylic Copolymer And Rubber Material App 20210309846 - OKADA; Ryo ;   et al. | 2021-10-07 |
Composition for sportswear and foam thereof Grant 9,416,241 - Ozaki , et al. August 16, 2 | 2016-08-16 |
Composition for vulcanizing adhesion Grant 9,404,022 - Hamaguchi , et al. August 2, 2 | 2016-08-02 |
Composition For Sportswear And Foam Thereof App 20140316021 - Ozaki; Taro ;   et al. | 2014-10-23 |
Composition For Vulcanizing Adhesion App 20130236670 - Hamaguchi; Koshiro ;   et al. | 2013-09-12 |
Vulcanizable rubber composition for use in an air spring and rubber formed product for use in an air spring Grant 8,530,587 - Matoba , et al. September 10, 2 | 2013-09-10 |
Laminated Body App 20130230675 - Masui; Toshiaki ;   et al. | 2013-09-05 |
Vulcanizable Rubber Composition For Use In An Air Spring And Rubber Formed Product For Use In An Air Spring App 20110160342 - Matoba; Yasuo ;   et al. | 2011-06-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.