Kim; Peter Jihoon
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kim; Peter Jihoon.The latest application filed is for "system and method for on-chain rewards".
- Kim; Peter Jihoon - San Francisco CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| System and method for on-chain rewards Grant 11,455,650 - Kim September 27, 2 | 2022-09-27 |
| System and method for secure sensitive data storage and recovery Grant 11,394,543 - Collier , et al. July 19, 2 | 2022-07-19 |
| Wallet recovery method Grant 11,367,066 - Kim June 21, 2 | 2022-06-21 |
| Systems And Methods For Consensus-based Access Control For Smart Contract Functions App 20210374731 - Kim; Peter Jihoon | 2021-12-02 |
| System And Method For On-chain Rewards App 20210374791 - Kim; Peter Jihoon | 2021-12-02 |
| Method And System For Mobile Cryptocurrency Wallet Connectivity App 20210056541 - Kim; Peter Jihoon | 2021-02-25 |
| Systems And Methods For Blockchain Transaction Management App 20200364703 - Joveski; Bojan ; et al. | 2020-11-19 |
| System And Method For Secure Sensitive Data Storage And Recovery App 20200195433 - Collier; Paul ; et al. | 2020-06-18 |
| Wallet Recovery Method App 20200005282 - Kim; Peter Jihoon | 2020-01-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 