loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kim; Jeoung Soo.The latest application filed is for "electrode manufacturing method comprising cleaning step using laser, electrode manufactured by method, and secondary battery comprising same".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Electrode Manufacturing Method Comprising Cleaning Step Using Laser, Electrode Manufactured By Method, and Secondary Battery Comprising Same App 20220149355 - Choi; Hyoung Sik ;   et al. | 2022-05-12 |
Method for injecting electrolyte Grant 9,601,746 - Lee , et al. March 21, 2 | 2017-03-21 |
Secondary battery structure Grant 9,590,214 - Woo , et al. March 7, 2 | 2017-03-07 |
Secondary battery case and method for manufacturing secondary battery Grant 9,263,725 - Park , et al. February 16, 2 | 2016-02-16 |
Method For Injecting Electrolyte App 20160036034 - LEE; Dong Sub ;   et al. | 2016-02-04 |
Secondary Battery Case And Method For Manufacturing Secondary Battery App 20150089799 - PARK; Sin Young ;   et al. | 2015-04-02 |
Secondary Battery Structure App 20140272548 - WOO; Sang Jin ;   et al. | 2014-09-18 |
Device for sealing lithium secondary battery electrolyte injecting hole Grant 6,761,996 - Kim , et al. July 13, 2 | 2004-07-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.