Keyes; Gary S.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Keyes; Gary S..The latest application filed is for "dual energy imaging with kinestatic charge detector".
- Keyes; Gary S. - Hartland WI
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Dual energy imaging with kinestatic charge detector Grant 4,780,897 - McDaniel , et al. October 25, 1 | 1988-10-25 |
| Region-of-interest digital subtraction angiography Grant 4,559,557 - Keyes , et al. December 17, 1 | 1985-12-17 |
| Integrated hybrid image remasking in a subtraction angiography method Grant 4,551,800 - Riederer , et al. November 5, 1 | 1985-11-05 |
| Method and apparatus for X-ray image subtraction Grant 4,482,918 - Keyes , et al. November 13, 1 | 1984-11-13 |
| X-Ray image digital subtraction system Grant 4,399,457 - Riederer , et al. August 16, 1 | 1983-08-16 |
| Subtraction fluoroscopy method and apparatus Grant 4,393,402 - Keyes , et al. July 12, 1 | 1983-07-12 |
| X-ray image subtracting system Grant 4,355,331 - Georges , et al. October 19, 1 | 1982-10-19 |
| NCAGE Code | 4RCN5 | KEYES, GARY S |
| CAGE Code | 4RCN5 | KEYES, GARY S |
| DUNS | 798807512 | KEYES, GARY S |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 