Keppler; Joachim
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Keppler; Joachim.The latest application filed is for "sensor apparatus and self-propelled floor cleaning appliance having a sensor apparatus".
- Keppler; Joachim - Winnenden DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Sensor apparatus and self-propelled floor cleaning appliance having a sensor apparatus Grant 7,225,500 - Diehl , et al. June 5, 2 | 2007-06-05 |
| Floor treatment system with self-propelled and self-steering floor treatment unit Grant 7,055,210 - Keppler , et al. June 6, 2 | 2006-06-06 |
| Floor treatment system Grant 7,053,578 - Diehl , et al. May 30, 2 | 2006-05-30 |
| Sensor apparatus and self-propelled floor cleaning appliance having a sensor apparatus App 20050172445 - Diehl, Ralph ; et al. | 2005-08-11 |
| Floor treatment system App 20050166352 - Keppler, Joachim ; et al. | 2005-08-04 |
| Method for operating a floor cleaning system, and floor cleaning system for use of the method App 20050150519 - Keppler, Joachim ; et al. | 2005-07-14 |
| Floor treatment system App 20050150074 - Diehl, Ralph ; et al. | 2005-07-14 |
| Floor cleaning appliance App 20040074044 - Diehl, Ralph ; et al. | 2004-04-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 