loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kempe; Tomas.The latest application filed is for "oligonucleotide labeling reagents".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Oligonucleotide labeling reagents Grant 6,734,297 - Kempe May 11, 2 | 2004-05-11 |
Oligonucleotide labeling reagents App 20030109032 - Kempe, Tomas | 2003-06-12 |
Oligonucleotide Labeling Reagents App 20020198370 - Kempe, Tomas | 2002-12-26 |
Apparatus for rapid evaporation of aqueous solutions Grant 5,897,838 - Kempe April 27, 1 | 1999-04-27 |
Anhydrous amine cleavage of oligonucleotides Grant 5,750,672 - Kempe May 12, 1 | 1998-05-12 |
Recovery of oligonucleotides by gas phase cleavage Grant 5,738,829 - Kempe April 14, 1 | 1998-04-14 |
Process and reagents for processing synthetic oligonucleotides Grant 5,656,741 - Chow , et al. August 12, 1 | 1997-08-12 |
Method for evaporating solvent using filter Grant 5,648,271 - Kempe July 15, 1 | 1997-07-15 |
Recovery of oligonucleotides by gas phase cleavage Grant 5,514,789 - Kempe May 7, 1 | 1996-05-07 |
Molecular cloning of RNA using RNA ligase and synthetic oligonucleotides Grant 4,661,450 - Kempe , et al. April 28, 1 | 1987-04-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.