Keith; John C.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Keith; John C..The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for the mapping of physically non-contiguous memory fragments to be linearly addressable".
- Keith; John C. - Loveland CO
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and apparatus for the mapping of physically non-contiguous memory fragments to be linearly addressable Grant 5,293,593 - Hodge , et al. March 8, 1 | 1994-03-08 |
| Ergonomic digitizer stylus Grant 4,707,571 - Clements , et al. November 17, 1 | 1987-11-17 |
| Graphics tablet menu locator accommodating differing sizes of paper Grant 4,697,048 - Clements , et al. September 29, 1 | 1987-09-29 |
| Adaptable programmed calculator including a percent keyboard operator Grant 4,181,966 - Wenninger , et al. January 1, 1 | 1980-01-01 |
| Programmable calculator employing a read-write memory having a movable boundary between program and data storage sections thereof Grant 4,089,059 - Miller , et al. May 9, 1 | 1978-05-09 |
| Adaptable programmed calculator having provision for plug-in keyboard and memory modules Grant 3,971,925 - Wenninger , et al. July 27, 1 | 1976-07-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 