Kazarian; Randal N.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kazarian; Randal N..The latest application filed is for "multi-chambered container fluid selection valve".
- Kazarian; Randal N. - Santa Barbara CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Multi-chambered container fluid selection valve Grant 7,090,097 - Kazarian , et al. August 15, 2 | 2006-08-15 |
| Multi-chambered container fluid selection valve Grant 6,769,573 - Kazarian , et al. August 3, 2 | 2004-08-03 |
| Fluid coupling for matching delivery and supply lines irrespective of the relative rotational positions of the coupling members Grant RE38,204 - Kazarian July 29, 2 | 2003-07-29 |
| Two-handed input control apparatus and method Grant 6,486,868 - Kazarian November 26, 2 | 2002-11-26 |
| Fluid coupling for matching delivery and supply lines irrespective of the relative rotational positions of the coupling members Grant 6,007,107 - Kazarian December 28, 1 | 1999-12-28 |
| Two-handed input apparatus and method Grant 5,949,401 - Kazarian September 7, 1 | 1999-09-07 |
| Pump-mountable valve for selecting one of a plurality of fluids for dispensing Grant 5,370,275 - Mills , et al. December 6, 1 | 1994-12-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 