Kawabe; Daisuke
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kawabe; Daisuke.The latest application filed is for "stent, microcatheter, braiding apparatus for continuous hoselike body, and process for manufacturing stent".
- Kawabe; Daisuke - Osaka JP
- Kawabe; Daisuke - Tokyo JP
- Kawabe; Daisuke - Fukushima JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Stent, Microcatheter, Braiding Apparatus For Continuous Hoselike Body, And Process For Manufacturing Stent App 20100211154 - Murayama; Yuichi | 2010-08-19 |
| Wire for inserting into biological duct Grant 7,621,935 - Saito , et al. November 24, 2 | 2009-11-24 |
| Infusion therapy Grant 7,329,237 - Yokoyama , et al. February 12, 2 | 2008-02-12 |
| Balloon Catheter App 20070255207 - Hangai; Masanori ; et al. | 2007-11-01 |
| Tool for removing foreign object in pipe line App 20060276814 - Omata; Sadao ; et al. | 2006-12-07 |
| Wire for inserting into biological duct App 20060173489 - Saito; Satoshi ; et al. | 2006-08-03 |
| Balloon catheter and device for injecting medical treatment method App 20050273050 - Yokoyama, Shinichiro ; et al. | 2005-12-08 |
| Infusion therapy App 20050159703 - Yokoyama, Shinichiro ; et al. | 2005-07-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 