Kassner; Christopher A.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kassner; Christopher A..The latest application filed is for "pipe-in-pipe apparatus including an engineered pipe".
- Kassner; Christopher A. - Houston TX
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Pipe-in-pipe apparatus including an engineered pipe Grant 9,303,795 - Critsinelis , et al. April 5, 2 | 2016-04-05 |
| Methods, systems and apparatus for circulating fluid within the annulus of a flexible pipe riser Grant 8,820,412 - Critsinelis , et al. September 2, 2 | 2014-09-02 |
| Methods and systems for circulating fluid within the annulus of a flexible pipe riser Grant 8,783,358 - Critsinelis , et al. July 22, 2 | 2014-07-22 |
| Pipe-in-pipe Apparatus Including An Engineered Pipe App 20140116556 - Critsinelis; Antonio C.F. ; et al. | 2014-05-01 |
| Methods And Systems For Circulating Fluid Within The Annulus Of A Flexible Pipe Riser App 20130068465 - Critsinelis; Antonio C.F. ; et al. | 2013-03-21 |
| Methods, Systems And Apparatus For Circulating Fluid Within The Annulus Of A Flexible Pipe Riser App 20130068464 - Critsinelis; Antonio C.F. ; et al. | 2013-03-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 