Karandikar; Shrikrishna

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Karandikar; Shrikrishna.The latest application filed is for "methods and systems for filtering encrypted traffic".

Company Profile

0.16.6

Karandikar; Shrikrishna - Fremont CA
Karandikar; Shrikrishna - Sunnyvale CA

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
System and method for offloading packet processing and static analysis operations Grant 11,082,436 - Amin , et al. August 3, 2	2021-08-03
System and method for separated packet processing and static analysis Grant 10,454,953 - Amin , et al. Oc	2019-10-22
System, device and method for detecting a malicious attack based on direct communications between remotely hosted virtual machines and malicious web servers Grant 9,838,408 - Karandikar , et al. December 5, 2	2017-12-05
System and method for offloading packet processing and static analysis operations Grant 9,787,700 - Amin , et al. October 10, 2	2017-10-10
Methods and systems for filtering encrypted traffic Grant 9,667,603 - Sandoval , et al. May 30, 2	2017-05-30
Network-based malware detection Grant 9,661,009 - Karandikar , et al. May 23, 2	2017-05-23
Collaborative application classification Grant 9,608,916 - Muppala , et al. March 28, 2	2017-03-28
System and method for offloading packet processing and static analysis operations Grant 9,591,015 - Amin , et al. March 7, 2	2017-03-07
Methods And Systems For Filtering Encrypted Traffic App 20160248737 - Sandoval; Andrew L. ; et al.	2016-08-25
System, device and method for detecting a malicious attack based on communcations between remotely hosted virtual machines and malicious web servers Grant 9,398,028 - Karandikar , et al. July 19, 2	2016-07-19
Methods and systems for filtering encrypted traffic Grant 9,304,832 - Sandoval , et al. April 5, 2	2016-04-05
Collaborative Application Classification App 20140258489 - Muppala; Suresh ; et al.	2014-09-11
Method and system for authentication among peer appliances within a computer network Grant 8,312,264 - Kelly , et al. November 13, 2	2012-11-13
Method and apparatus for request routing Grant 8,234,402 - Karandikar , et al. July 31, 2	2012-07-31
System and method for distributed SSL processing between co-operating nodes Grant 8,225,085 - Karandikar July 17, 2	2012-07-17
Methods And Systems For Filtering Encrypted Traffic App 20090178061 - Sandoval; Andrew L ; et al.	2009-07-09
Using digital certificates to request client consent prior to decrypting SSL communications Grant 7,543,146 - Karandikar , et al. June 2, 2	2009-06-02
System And Method For Distributed Ssl Processing Between Co-operating Nodes App 20080307219 - Karandikar; Shrikrishna	2008-12-11
Method and System for Authentication Among Peer Appliances Within a Computer Network App 20080184030 - Kelly; Thomas J. ; et al.	2008-07-31
Method And Apparatus For Request Routing App 20080177897 - Karandikar; Shrikrishna ; et al.	2008-07-24
Method for routing a request over a network to a content source that can most advantageous serve the request Grant 7,340,521 - Karandikar , et al. March 4, 2	2008-03-04

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.