Kantz; Dieter
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kantz; Dieter.The latest application filed is for "test configuration for the functional testing of a semiconductor chip".
- Kantz; Dieter - Hennigsdorf DE
- Kantz; Dieter - Munchen DE
- Kantz; Dieter - Munich DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Test configuration for the functional testing of a semiconductor chip Grant 6,825,682 - Kantz , et al. November 30, 2 | 2004-11-30 |
| Test configuration for the functional testing of a semiconductor chip App 20010043078 - Kantz, Dieter ; et al. | 2001-11-22 |
| Method of operating a semiconductor memory with a capability of testing, and an evaluation circuit for performing the method Grant 4,752,929 - Kantz , et al. June 21, 1 | 1988-06-21 |
| Integrated semiconductor circuit with a dynamic read-write memory Grant 4,602,353 - Wawersig , et al. July 22, 1 | 1986-07-22 |
| Semiconductor circuit with a circuit part controlled by a substrate bias Grant 4,454,431 - Hoffmann , et al. June 12, 1 | 1984-06-12 |
| Monolithically integrated semiconductor memory with dummy and charge equalization cells Grant 4,393,478 - Kantz , et al. July 12, 1 | 1983-07-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 