Kameyama; Mayumi
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kameyama; Mayumi.The latest application filed is for "biotinylated and oxidized ldl receptor and advanced glycation end product receptor produced using genetically engineered silkworm".
- Kameyama; Mayumi - Tsukuba JP
- Kameyama; Mayumi - Tsukuba-shi JP
- Kameyama; Mayumi - Kashiwa JP
- Kameyama; Mayumi - Chiba JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Biotinylated and oxidized LDL receptor and advanced glycation end product receptor produced using genetically engineered silkworm Grant 11,311,002 - Machida , et al. April 26, 2 | 2022-04-26 |
| Biotinylated And Oxidized Ldl Receptor And Advanced Glycation End Product Receptor Produced Using Genetically Engineered Silkworm App 20170354129 - Machida; Sachiko ; et al. | 2017-12-14 |
| Nitrification inhibitor and soil improver and fertilizer containing the same Grant 7,892,312 - Subbarao , et al. February 22, 2 | 2011-02-22 |
| Nitrification inhibitor and soil improver and fertilizer containing the same App 20070028659 - Subbarao; Guntur V. ; et al. | 2007-02-08 |
| Naringenin derivatives and use thereof Grant 6,770,630 - Kashiwaba , et al. August 3, 2 | 2004-08-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 