Kambara; Koji
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kambara; Koji.The latest application filed is for "high-frequency surgical treating device for use with endoscope".
- Kambara; Koji - Hachioji JP
- Kambara; Koji - Tokyo JP
- Kambara; Koji - Hachioji City JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| High-frequency surgical treating device for use with endoscope Grant 5,163,938 - Kambara , et al. November 17, 1 | 1992-11-17 |
| Ultrasonic observation system and an ultrasonic endoscope system Grant 4,936,307 - Saito , et al. June 26, 1 | 1990-06-26 |
| Endoscope with an optical system Grant 4,841,952 - Sato , et al. June 27, 1 | 1989-06-27 |
| Optical fiber assembly for an endoscope Grant 4,813,400 - Washizuka , et al. March 21, 1 | 1989-03-21 |
| Endoscope Grant 4,773,395 - Suzuki , et al. September 27, 1 | 1988-09-27 |
| Insertion section of an endoscope Grant 4,756,303 - Kawashima , et al. July 12, 1 | 1988-07-12 |
| Medical capsule device Grant 4,507,115 - Kambara , et al. * March 26, 1 | 1985-03-26 |
| Intelligent copier Grant 4,486,787 - Gocho , et al. December 4, 1 | 1984-12-04 |
| Medical capsule device Grant 4,439,197 - Honda , et al. March 27, 1 | 1984-03-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 