Kalafus; Rudolph M.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kalafus; Rudolph M..The latest application filed is for "system for using differential gps receivers with autopilot systems for category iii precision approaches".
- Kalafus; Rudolph M. - Los Gatos CA
- Kalafus; Rudolph M. - Newton MA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| System for using differential GPS receivers with autopilot systems for category III precision approaches Grant 6,342,853 - Kalafus , et al. January 29, 2 | 2002-01-29 |
| Inexpensive monitoring technique for achieving high level integrity monitoring for differential GPS Grant 5,969,670 - Kalafus , et al. October 19, 1 | 1999-10-19 |
| System for using differential GPS receivers with autopilot systems for category III precision approaches Grant 5,945,943 - Kalafus , et al. August 31, 1 | 1999-08-31 |
| Wide augmentation system retrofit receiver Grant 5,877,725 - Kalafus March 2, 1 | 1999-03-02 |
| Networked differential GPS system Grant 5,323,322 - Mueller , et al. June 21, 1 | 1994-06-21 |
| VHF/radar transponder collision avoidance aid Grant 4,684,949 - Kalafus August 4, 1 | 1987-08-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 