Kakinuma; Hiroaki
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kakinuma; Hiroaki.The latest application filed is for "dental polymerizable composition".
- Kakinuma; Hiroaki - Tokyo JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Dental polymerizable composition Grant 11,413,222 - Sato , et al. August 16, 2 | 2022-08-16 |
| Dental Polymerizable Composition App 20210298999 - SATO; Keita ; et al. | 2021-09-30 |
| Dental Polymerizable Composition App 20210299000 - MURAKAMI; Shogo ; et al. | 2021-09-30 |
| Dental adhesive agent and method of manufacturing thereof Grant 10,561,584 - Kakinuma , et al. Feb | 2020-02-18 |
| Dental Adhesive Agent And Method Of Manufacturing Thereof App 20180280252 - Kakinuma; Hiroaki ; et al. | 2018-10-04 |
| Photodetector device having stacked structure with improved response rate Grant 6,894,267 - Kakinuma May 17, 2 | 2005-05-17 |
| Optical semiconductor device and method of fabricating the same Grant 6,858,886 - Kakinuma , et al. February 22, 2 | 2005-02-22 |
| Optical semiconductor device and method of fabricating the same App 20030197172 - Kakinuma, Hiroaki ; et al. | 2003-10-23 |
| Photodetector device App 20020050592 - Kakinuma, Hiroaki | 2002-05-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 