Judge; John Thomas
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Judge; John Thomas.The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for connecting privately addressed networks".
- Judge; John Thomas - Coogee AU
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Inter private network communications between IPv4 hosts using IPv6 Grant 7,277,453 - Chin , et al. October 2, 2 | 2007-10-02 |
| Method and system of automatic allocation of unique subnet identifier to a subnet in the network having multiple subnets and a plurality of associated routers and router interfaces Grant 6,917,977 - White , et al. July 12, 2 | 2005-07-12 |
| Method and apparatus for connecting privately addressed networks App 20050066035 - Williams, Aidan Michael ; et al. | 2005-03-24 |
| Inter private newtwork communications between IPv4 hosts using IPv6 App 20040240468 - Chin, Kwan Wu ; et al. | 2004-12-02 |
| Method and machine for validating an identifier as unique App 20030088574 - White, Andrew Edward ; et al. | 2003-05-08 |
| Automatic allocation of subnet identifiers in a network App 20030088673 - White, Andrew Edward ; et al. | 2003-05-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 