Jrb Attachments L L C
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Jrb Attachments L L C. Jrb Attachments L L C has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "LINCLOC"
- Company Aliases
- JRB Attachments, LLC
- JRB ATTACHMENTS, LLC -
- JRB Attachments, LLC -
- JRB ATTACHMENTS, LLC - Akron OH
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| COUPLER WITH SAFETY CAM 20100172732 - 12/683762 Daraie; Shadruz ; et al. | 2010-07-08 |
| COUPLER WITH SECONDARY LOCK ON FRONT HOOK 20100124453 - 12/622921 Sikorski; Robert ; et al. | 2010-05-20 |
| SPREAD-STYLE COUPLER WITH SUPPLEMENTAL SAFETY LOCK 20100031539 - 12/537578 Daraie; Shadruz ; et al. | 2010-02-11 |
| Spread-style coupler with supplemental lock system 20080175657 - 12/001326 Fatemi; Ray S. | 2008-07-24 |
| LOADER COUPLER WITH MULTIPLE PICK-UP LOCATIONS 20080141566 - 11/936359 Esser; Timothy C. ; et al. | 2008-06-19 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"LINCLOC" 77468269 |
LINCLOC 2008-05-07 |
| NCAGE Code | 66545 | JRB ATTACHMENTS LLC!DBA C & P ATTACHMENTS |
| CAGE Code | 66545 | JRB ATTACHMENTS, LLC C & P ATTACHMENTS |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 