loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Jones; Haydn Terence.The latest application filed is for "non-steroidal glucocorticoid inhibitors and their use in treating inflammation, allergy and auto-immune conditions".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Non-Steroidal Glucocorticoid Inhibitors and Their Use in Treating Inflammation, Allergy and Auto-Immune Conditions App 20120277279 - BARNETT; Heather Anne ;   et al. | 2012-11-01 |
Non-steroidal glucocorticoid inhibitors and their use in treating inflammation, allergy and auto-immune conditions Grant 8,247,377 - Barnett , et al. August 21, 2 | 2012-08-21 |
Novel Compounds App 20100234441 - Barnett; Heather Anne ;   et al. | 2010-09-16 |
Pyrazole Derivatives As Non-steroidal Glucocorticoid Receptor Ligands App 20100035926 - Campbell; Ian Baxter ;   et al. | 2010-02-11 |
Phenyl-Pyrazole Derivatives as Non-Steroidal Glucocorticoid Receptor Ligands App 20080207725 - Barker; Michael David ;   et al. | 2008-08-28 |
Naphathalene derivatives which bind to the EP4 receptor Grant 6,924,297 - Giblin , et al. August 2, 2 | 2005-08-02 |
Naphathalene derivatives which bind to the ep4 receptor App 20040102508 - Giblin, Gerard Martin Paul ;   et al. | 2004-05-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.