Trademark applications and grants for Jones Clifton. Jones Clifton has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BROOKLYN BRIM COMPANY"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
MULTI-FLAVOR FOOD AND/OR BEVERAGE DISPENSER 20200128852 - 16/726238 POPOV; Igor V. ;   et al. | 2020-04-30 |
MULTI-FLAVOR FOOD AND/OR BEVERAGE DISPENSER 20190098914 - 16/163712 POPOV; Igor V. ;   et al. | 2019-04-04 |
MULTI-FLAVOR FOOD AND/OR BEVERAGE DISPENSER 20160229675 - 15/018185 POPOV; Igor V. ;   et al. | 2016-08-11 |
Multi-flavor food and/or beverage dispenser 11,297,850 - 16/726,238 Popov , et al. April 12, 2 | 2022-04-12 |
Multi-flavor food and/or beverage dispenser 11,252,976 - 16/163,712 Popov , et al. February 22, 2 | 2022-02-22 |
Multi-flavor food and/or beverage dispenser 10,512,276 - 15/018,185 Popov , et al. Dec | 2019-12-24 |
Multi-functional vehicle caddy and associated use thereof 10,232,867 - 15/629,735 Jones , et al. | 2019-03-19 |
Multi-functional vehicle caddy and associated use thereof 10,232,867 - 15/629,735 Jones , et al. | 2019-03-19 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "BROOKLYN BRIM COMPANY" 77296054 |
BROOKLYN BRIM COMPANY 2007-10-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.