Johnson; E. Dywayne

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Johnson; E. Dywayne.The latest application filed is for "computer program, method, and system for preventing execution of viruses and malware".

Company Profile

0.1.4

Johnson; E. Dywayne - Kansas City MO

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Computer Program, Method, And System For Preventing Execution Of Viruses And Malware App 20160044051 - Butler; Daniel Earl ; et al.	2016-02-11
Computer program, method, and system for preventing execution of viruses and malware Grant 9,197,656 - Butler , et al. November 24, 2	2015-11-24
Computer Program, Method, And System For Preventing Execution Of Viruses And Malware App 20140173735 - Butler; Daniel Earl ; et al.	2014-06-19
Computer Program, Method, And System For Preventing Execution Of Viruses And Malware App 20140150106 - Butler; Daniel Earl ; et al.	2014-05-29
Computer Program, Method, And System For Preventing Execution Of Viruses And Malware App 20120311710 - Butler; Daniel Earl ; et al.	2012-12-06

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.