loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Jenkins; Richard A..The latest application filed is for "two way self mailer from one ply of paper".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Two way self mailer from one ply of paper Grant 5,622,390 - Jenkins April 22, 1 | 1997-04-22 |
Eccentric C-fold mailer with a plurality of reply envelopes Grant 5,360,160 - Sauerwine , et al. November 1, 1 | 1994-11-01 |
Mailer Grant 4,981,251 - Jenkins , et al. January 1, 1 | 1991-01-01 |
Mailer Grant 4,927,072 - Jenkins , et al. May 22, 1 | 1990-05-22 |
Two-part mailer with top-opening return envelope Grant 4,830,269 - Jenkins May 16, 1 | 1989-05-16 |
Windowed mailer with tumble-style return envelope for remittance document, having return mail-to address exposed by removal of apertured cover Grant 4,756,468 - Jenkins July 12, 1 | 1988-07-12 |
Windowed mailer with return envelope for remittance document, having return mail-to address exposed by removal of original mail-to label Grant 4,706,877 - Jenkins November 17, 1 | 1987-11-17 |
Folding ladder for truck mounted loader Grant 3,989,122 - Jenkins November 2, 1 | 1976-11-02 |
Dental floss applicator Grant 3,906,963 - Jenkins , et al. September 23, 1 | 1975-09-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.