Jelvis; Alexei
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Jelvis; Alexei.The latest application filed is for "method and system for electronic file lifecycle management".
- Jelvis; Alexei - Menlo Park CA
- Jelvis; Alexei - Nepean CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Disaster recovery systems and methods with low recovery point objectives Grant 11,036,594 - Shats , et al. June 15, 2 | 2021-06-15 |
| Automatic read and write acceleration of data accessed by virtual machines Grant 9,699,263 - Shats , et al. July 4, 2 | 2017-07-04 |
| Method And System For Electronic File Lifecycle Management App 20140330800 - Shaath; Kamel ; et al. | 2014-11-06 |
| Method and system for electronic file lifecycle management Grant 8,782,009 - Shaath , et al. July 15, 2 | 2014-07-15 |
| Tracking block-level writes Grant 8,589,913 - Jelvis , et al. November 19, 2 | 2013-11-19 |
| Tracking Block-level Writes App 20110088027 - JELVIS; Alexei ; et al. | 2011-04-14 |
| Method and system for electronic file lifecycle management App 20080263112 - Shaath; Kamel ; et al. | 2008-10-23 |
| Method and System for Electronic File Lifecycle Management App 20060010150 - Shaath; Kamel ; et al. | 2006-01-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 