Jarral; Omar
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Jarral; Omar.The latest application filed is for "percutaneous repair of mitral prolapse".
- Jarral; Omar - London GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Percutaneous Repair Of Mitral Prolapse App 20220023044 - Jarral; Omar ; et al. | 2022-01-27 |
| Dome structure for improved left ventricle function Grant 11,173,033 - Weber , et al. November 16, 2 | 2021-11-16 |
| Percutaneous repair of mitral prolapse Grant 11,141,275 - Jarral , et al. October 12, 2 | 2021-10-12 |
| Heart valve repair implant for treating tricuspid regurgitation Grant 10,806,579 - Jarral , et al. October 20, 2 | 2020-10-20 |
| Percutaneous papillary muscle relocation Grant 10,799,356 - McAfee , et al. October 13, 2 | 2020-10-13 |
| Heart Valve Repair Implant For Treating Tricuspid Regurgitation App 20190117388 - Jarral; Omar ; et al. | 2019-04-25 |
| Dome Structure For Improved Left Ventricle Function App 20190091024 - Weber; Jan ; et al. | 2019-03-28 |
| Percutaneous Repair Of Mitral Prolapse App 20190083264 - Jarral; Omar ; et al. | 2019-03-21 |
| Percutaneous Papillary Muscle Relocation App 20190076248 - McAfee; Patricia ; et al. | 2019-03-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 