loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Jamadagni; Nikhil.The latest application filed is for "partition level operation with concurrent activities".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Partition Level Operation With Concurrent Activities App 20210081395 - Pathak; Amit ;   et al. | 2021-03-18 |
Partition level operation with concurrent activities Grant 10,803,046 - Pathak , et al. October 13, 2 | 2020-10-13 |
Partition Level Operation With Concurrent Activities App 20180137159 - Pathak; Amit ;   et al. | 2018-05-17 |
Partition level operation with concurrent activities Grant 9,916,341 - Pathak , et al. March 13, 2 | 2018-03-13 |
System and method of failover recovery Grant 9,740,582 - Eluri , et al. August 22, 2 | 2017-08-22 |
System And Method Of Failover Recovery App 20170192863 - Eluri; Amarnadh Sai ;   et al. | 2017-07-06 |
Partition Level Operation With Concurrent Activities App 20160364430 - Pathak; Amit ;   et al. | 2016-12-15 |
Partition level operation with concurrent activities Grant 9,342,549 - Pathak , et al. May 17, 2 | 2016-05-17 |
Partition Level Operation With Concurrent Activities App 20150261807 - Pathak; Amit ;   et al. | 2015-09-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.