Jaggi; Bruno W.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Jaggi; Bruno W..The latest application filed is for "imaging system with automatic gain control for reflectance and fluorescence endoscopy".
- Jaggi; Bruno W. - Vancouver CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and apparatus for automatically detecting malignancy-associated changes Grant 6,493,460 - MacAulay , et al. December 10, 2 | 2002-12-10 |
| Imaging system with automatic gain control for reflectance and fluorescence endoscopy Grant 6,462,770 - Cline , et al. October 8, 2 | 2002-10-08 |
| Imaging system with automatic gain control for reflectance and fluorescence endoscopy App 20020093563 - Cline, Richard W. ; et al. | 2002-07-18 |
| Method and apparatus for automatically detecting malignancy-associated changes Grant 5,889,881 - MacAulay , et al. March 30, 1 | 1999-03-30 |
| Endoscopic imaging system for diseased tissue Grant 5,769,792 - Palcic , et al. June 23, 1 | 1998-06-23 |
| Imaging system for detecting diseased tissue using native fluorsecence in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tract Grant 5,647,368 - Zeng , et al. July 15, 1 | 1997-07-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 