Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha.The latest application filed is for "electric shaver".
- Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha - Nagano JP
- Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha - Matsumoto JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Electric shaver Grant D311,974 - Izumi November 6, 1 | 1990-11-06 |
| Electric shaver Grant D311,973 - Izumi November 6, 1 | 1990-11-06 |
| Circuit breaker Grant 4,853,822 - Kamijo August 1, 1 | 1989-08-01 |
| Fixing structure of blade force up spring for clothes shaver and electric shaver Grant 4,839,964 - Uchiyama , et al. June 20, 1 | 1989-06-20 |
| Electric shaver Grant D297,772 - Izumi September 20, 1 | 1988-09-20 |
| Shaving cutter Grant D294,981 - Izumi March 29, 1 | 1988-03-29 |
| Shaving cutter Grant D294,982 - Izumi March 29, 1 | 1988-03-29 |
| Inner rotary cutters for electric shavers and manufacturing processes for the same Grant 4,729,169 - Asawa March 8, 1 | 1988-03-08 |
| Electric shaver Grant D284,317 - Izumi June 17, 1 | 1986-06-17 |
| Electric shaver Grant D284,224 - Izumi June 10, 1 | 1986-06-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 