Isojima; Shigeki
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Isojima; Shigeki.The latest application filed is for "superconductive wire and current limiter".
- Isojima; Shigeki - Osaka JP
- ISOJIMA; Shigeki - Osaka-shi Osaka
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Current-limiting device utilizing a superconductor for a current-limiting operation Grant 10,218,170 - Isojima , et al. Feb | 2019-02-26 |
| Superconductive Wire And Current Limiter App 20180152016 - HONDA; Yoshihiro ; et al. | 2018-05-31 |
| Current-limiting and power-flow control device Grant 9,762,051 - Isojima , et al. September 12, 2 | 2017-09-12 |
| Current-limiting And Power-flow Control Device App 20160020604 - ISOJIMA; Shigeki ; et al. | 2016-01-21 |
| Current-limiting Device App 20160013635 - ISOJIMA; Shigeki ; et al. | 2016-01-14 |
| Fault current limiter Grant 9,190,838 - Isojima , et al. November 17, 2 | 2015-11-17 |
| Fault Current Limiter App 20140087950 - Isojima; Shigeki ; et al. | 2014-03-27 |
| Saddle type dipolar coil eliminating only sextupole components of magnetic field Grant 5,027,098 - Okazaki , et al. June 25, 1 | 1991-06-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 