Ishikawa Tekko Kabushiki Kaisha
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ishikawa Tekko Kabushiki Kaisha.The latest application filed is for "ball joint".
- Ishikawa Tekko Kabushiki Kaisha - Tokyo JP
- Ishikawa Tekko Kabushiki Kaisha - both of JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Ball joint Grant 5,009,538 - Shirai , et al. April 23, 1 | 1991-04-23 |
| Ball joint Grant 4,954,006 - Suzuki , et al. September 4, 1 | 1990-09-04 |
| Ball joint and its manufacturing method Grant 4,904,107 - Fukukawa , et al. February 27, 1 | 1990-02-27 |
| Drain bolt Grant 4,810,148 - Aisa , et al. March 7, 1 | 1989-03-07 |
| Ball joint Grant 4,430,016 - Matsuoka , et al. February 7, 1 | 1984-02-07 |
| Device for detecting the overdischarge of battery Grant 4,132,942 - Yamamoto January 2, 1 | 1979-01-02 |
| Device for detecting the overdischarge of an accumulator as well as the surface level of the liquid contained in the accumulator Grant 4,055,708 - Yamamoto October 25, 1 | 1977-10-25 |
| Ball Joint Grant 3,847,490 - Uchida November 12, 1 | 1974-11-12 |
| Ball Joints Grant 3,731,957 - Uchida May 8, 1 | 1973-05-08 |
| Swivel Joint Grant 3,722,931 - Uchida March 27, 1 | 1973-03-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 