Institute for Industrial Research and Standards
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Institute for Industrial Research and Standards.The latest application filed is for "injection device".
- Institute for Industrial Research and Standards - Dublin IE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Injection device Grant 5,053,019 - Duffy October 1, 1 | 1991-10-01 |
| Position sensing apparatus Grant 4,912,643 - Beirne March 27, 1 | 1990-03-27 |
| Syringe and non-linear passageway reservoir for use therewith Grant 4,767,415 - Duffy August 30, 1 | 1988-08-30 |
| Grinding device Grant 4,744,178 - Afshar May 17, 1 | 1988-05-17 |
| Support assembly for shelving Grant 4,538,784 - O'Flanagan September 3, 1 | 1985-09-03 |
| Fence assembly Grant 4,526,347 - McLoughlin July 2, 1 | 1985-07-02 |
| Vaginal speculum Grant 4,432,351 - Hoary February 21, 1 | 1984-02-21 |
| Vibration sensing device Grant 4,185,180 - Anderson January 22, 1 | 1980-01-22 |
| Apparatus for cleaning submerged surfaces Grant 4,084,535 - Rees April 18, 1 | 1978-04-18 |
| Construction Of Stabilised Platform Grant 3,840,265 - Stirling , et al. October 8, 1 | 1974-10-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 