loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ifft; Stephen Arthur.The latest application filed is for "paddle style orifice plate with integral pressure ports".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Paddle style orifice plate with integral pressure ports Grant 9,651,410 - Stehle , et al. May 16, 2 | 2017-05-16 |
Paddle Style Orifice Plate With Integral Pressure Ports App 20160290840 - Stehle; John Henry ;   et al. | 2016-10-06 |
Retractable flow conditioner Grant 9,285,288 - Ifft March 15, 2 | 2016-03-15 |
Locating of pressure taps on face of orifice plate device Grant 9,062,994 - Ifft , et al. June 23, 2 | 2015-06-23 |
Retractable Flow Conditioner App 20150082895 - Ifft; Stephen Arthur | 2015-03-26 |
Sensor tube with reduced coherent vortex shedding Grant 7,836,780 - Garnett , et al. November 23, 2 | 2010-11-23 |
Conditioning orifice plate with pipe wall passages Grant 7,654,154 - Garnett , et al. February 2, 2 | 2010-02-02 |
Conditioning Orifice Plate With Pipe Wall Passages App 20090235757 - Garnett; John Everett ;   et al. | 2009-09-24 |
Locating Of Pressure Taps On Face Of Orifice Plate Device App 20080307896 - Ifft; Stephen Arthur ;   et al. | 2008-12-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.