Ichikawa; Kiyotaka
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ichikawa; Kiyotaka.The latest application filed is for "kickback-inhibiting devices for cutting devices".
- Ichikawa; Kiyotaka - Anjo JP
- Ichikawa; Kiyotaka - Anjo-shi JP
- Ichikawa; Kiyotaka - Okazaki JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Kickback-inhibiting devices for cutting devices Grant 7,631,585 - Ichikawa , et al. December 15, 2 | 2009-12-15 |
| Kickback-inhibiting devices for cutting devices App 20060042441 - Ichikawa; Kiyotaka ; et al. | 2006-03-02 |
| Miter saw Grant D383,765 - Kani , et al. September 16, 1 | 1997-09-16 |
| Electric ratchet wrench Grant D352,645 - Ichikawa November 22, 1 | 1994-11-22 |
| Power transmission mechanism of power-driven rotary tools Grant 5,343,961 - Ichikawa September 6, 1 | 1994-09-06 |
| Electric screwdriver Grant D340,396 - Ichikawa October 19, 1 | 1993-10-19 |
| Cordless screwdriver Grant D339,046 - Fushiya , et al. * September 7, 1 | 1993-09-07 |
| Portable electric circular saw Grant D332,735 - Fushiya , et al. January 26, 1 | 1993-01-26 |
| Cordless screwdriver Grant D320,917 - Fushiya , et al. October 22, 1 | 1991-10-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 