Hylton; Duane A.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hylton; Duane A..The latest application filed is for "electronic transaction receipt system and method".
- Hylton; Duane A. - Canton GA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Electronic Transaction Receipt System and Method App 20190304028 - Schultz; R. Steven ; et al. | 2019-10-03 |
| Electronic Transaction Receipt System and Method App 20140122172 - Schultz; R. Steven ; et al. | 2014-05-01 |
| Electronic transaction receipt system and method Grant 8,606,698 - Schultz , et al. December 10, 2 | 2013-12-10 |
| Electronic Transaction Receipt System and Method App 20090292591 - Schultz; R. Steven ; et al. | 2009-11-26 |
| Electronic transaction receipt system and method Grant 7,552,087 - Schultz , et al. June 23, 2 | 2009-06-23 |
| Electronic transaction receipt system and method App 20010029483 - Schultz, R. Steven ; et al. | 2001-10-11 |
| Electronic transaction receipt system and method App 20010029470 - Schultz, R. Steven ; et al. | 2001-10-11 |
| Electronic transaction receipt system and method App 20010029484 - Schultz, R. Steven ; et al. | 2001-10-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 