Hyde; Robert E.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hyde; Robert E..The latest application filed is for "apparatus for protecting pumps against cavitation".
- Hyde; Robert E. - Portland OR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus for protecting pumps against cavitation Grant 6,145,332 - Hyde November 14, 2 | 2000-11-14 |
| Process for dehumidifying air in an air-conditioned environment with climate control system Grant 5,664,425 - Hyde September 9, 1 | 1997-09-09 |
| Liquid pressure amplification with bypass Grant 5,626,025 - Hyde May 6, 1 | 1997-05-06 |
| Apparatus for dehumidifying air in an air-conditioned environment with climate control system Grant 5,509,272 - Hyde April 23, 1 | 1996-04-23 |
| Process for dehumidifying air in an air-conditioned environment Grant 5,329,782 - Hyde July 19, 1 | 1994-07-19 |
| Liquid pressure amplification with superheat suppression Grant 5,291,744 - Hyde March 8, 1 | 1994-03-08 |
| Liquid pressure amplification with superheat suppression Grant 5,150,580 - Hyde September 29, 1 | 1992-09-29 |
| Apparatus for maximizing refrigeration capacity Grant 4,599,873 - Hyde July 15, 1 | 1986-07-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 