loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hyde; Ralph E..The latest application filed is for "dual coil electrodynamic transducer with channels for voice coil cooling".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Dual coil electrodynamic transducer with channels for voice coil cooling Grant 10,306,370 - Hyde | 2019-05-28 |
Dual Coil Electrodynamic Transducer With Channels For Voice Coil Cooling App 20180206040 - HYDE; Ralph E. | 2018-07-19 |
Extended multiple gap motors for electromagnetic transducers Grant 8,249,291 - Hyde August 21, 2 | 2012-08-21 |
Self-cooling electromagnetic transducer Grant 8,014,555 - Hyde , et al. September 6, 2 | 2011-09-06 |
Self-cooling electromagnetic transducer App 20070237351 - Hyde; Ralph E. ;   et al. | 2007-10-11 |
Extended multiple gap motors for electromagnetic transducers App 20070230737 - Hyde; Ralph E. | 2007-10-04 |
Shorting rings in dual-coil dual-gap loudspeaker drivers Grant 6,847,726 - Button , et al. January 25, 2 | 2005-01-25 |
Shorting rings in dual-coil dual-gap loudspeaker drivers Grant 6,768,806 - Button , et al. July 27, 2 | 2004-07-27 |
Shorting rings in dual-coil dual-gap loudspeaker drivers App 20030190052 - Button, Douglas J. ;   et al. | 2003-10-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.