Trademark applications and grants for Huynh Anthony. Huynh Anthony has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "CAWFEE"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
VASCULAR EXPANDABLE DEVICES 20210338462 - 17/305696 Dawson; Marc ;   et al. | 2021-11-04 |
VASCULAR EXPANDABLE DEVICES 20210338251 - 17/305694 Dawson; Marc ;   et al. | 2021-11-04 |
TAPERED ELONGATE SHAFT FOR MEDICAL DEVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS 20210298731 - 17/249249 Pulugurtha; Syamala Rani ;   et al. | 2021-09-30 |
CATHETER 20190314604 - 16/454524 Jackson; Brad ;   et al. | 2019-10-17 |
VASCULAR EXPANDABLE DEVICES 20190240050 - 15/892293 Dawson; Marc ;   et al. | 2019-08-08 |
Catheter including tapering coil member 11,219,740 - 14/725,221 Jackson , et al. January 11, 2 | 2022-01-11 |
Vascular expandable devices 11,065,136 - 15/892,293 Dawson , et al. July 20, 2 | 2021-07-20 |
Vascular expandable devices 11,065,009 - 15/892,284 Dawson , et al. July 20, 2 | 2021-07-20 |
Catheter with tapering outer diameter 10,357,631 - 14/725,108 Jackson , et al. July 23, 2 | 2019-07-23 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "CAWFEE" 87451927 |
CAWFEE 2017-05-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.