Hurd; Bruce E
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hurd; Bruce E.The latest application filed is for "cam action shaft lock device and method".
- Hurd; Bruce E - Monroe CT
- Hurd, Bruce E. - Monroe CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and device for rotating a frictional surface in a friction feeder Grant 6,978,993 - Hurd December 27, 2 | 2005-12-27 |
| Cam action shaft lock device and method Grant 6,945,719 - Hurd September 20, 2 | 2005-09-20 |
| Method and device for rotating a frictional surface in a friction feeder App 20050082744 - Hurd, Bruce E. | 2005-04-21 |
| Cam Action Shaft Lock Device And Method App 20050084312 - Hurd, Bruce E. | 2005-04-21 |
| Shaft lock device and method Grant 6,817,796 - Hurd November 16, 2 | 2004-11-16 |
| Envelope addressing system adapted to simultaneously print addresses and bar codes Grant 5,326,181 - Eisner , et al. July 5, 1 | 1994-07-05 |
| Addressing machine Grant 5,094,554 - Hurd , et al. March 10, 1 | 1992-03-10 |
| System for feeding envelopes for simultaneous printing of addresses and bar codes Grant 4,858,907 - Eisner , et al. August 22, 1 | 1989-08-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 