Howarth; Graham F.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Howarth; Graham F..The latest application filed is for "apparatus for facilitating access to a nacelle interior and method of assembling the same".
- Howarth; Graham F. - Middletown DE US
- Howarth; Graham F. - Baltimore MD
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus for facilitating access to a nacelle interior Grant 9,188,025 - Calder , et al. November 17, 2 | 2015-11-17 |
| Apparatus for facilitating access to a nacelle interior and method of assembling the same Grant 9,188,026 - Calder , et al. November 17, 2 | 2015-11-17 |
| Apparatus For Facilitating Access To A Nacelle Interior App 20120280081 - Calder; David P. ; et al. | 2012-11-08 |
| Apparatus For Facilitating Access To A Nacelle Interior And Method Of Assembling The Same App 20120280082 - Calder; David P. ; et al. | 2012-11-08 |
| Nacelle and method of assembling the same Grant 8,220,738 - Calder , et al. July 17, 2 | 2012-07-17 |
| Nacelle And Method Of Assembling The Same App 20100127116 - Calder; David P. ; et al. | 2010-05-27 |
| Perforated Composite Structures And Methods Therefore App 20100112283 - Howarth; Graham F. ; et al. | 2010-05-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 