Hopps; Christian
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hopps; Christian.The latest application filed is for "maintaining protocol adjacency state with forwarding failure".
- Hopps; Christian - New York NY
- Hopps; Christian - San Francisco CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Maintaining protocol adjacency state with forwarding failure Grant 7,921,219 - Ginsberg , et al. April 5, 2 | 2011-04-05 |
| Technique for efficiently avoiding transient routing disturbances in link state routing protocols with link state packet fragmentation Grant 7,751,336 - Hopps , et al. July 6, 2 | 2010-07-06 |
| CSNP cache for efficient periodic CSNP in a router Grant 7,742,437 - Yeung , et al. June 22, 2 | 2010-06-22 |
| Maintaining protocol adjacency state with forwarding failure App 20100049868 - Ginsberg; Lester ; et al. | 2010-02-25 |
| Technique for efficiently avoiding transient routing disturbances in link state routing protocols with link state packet fragmentation App 20070286091 - Hopps; Christian ; et al. | 2007-12-13 |
| CSNP cache for efficient periodic CSNP in a router App 20060227790 - Yeung; Derek Man-Kit ; et al. | 2006-10-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 